(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-23 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahura-mazda.livejournal.com
That surprises me too. They've listed both Methylphenidates and Amphetamines lower than ketamine.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-23 12:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazymeandave.livejournal.com
they probably used the same "expert grooming" tactics as bbc news 24...

ha ha ha ha ha

Date: 2007-03-23 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazymeandave.livejournal.com
that's the single funniest thing i've read online today... and that includes this story curtesy of [livejournal.com profile] aliasrob [content potentially nsfw]

Re: ha ha ha ha ha

Date: 2007-03-23 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahura-mazda.livejournal.com
Oh god I'm going to have to save that until at least half of these bastards are on fag break or something.

The only way that is NSFW in this place is the fucking stampede of grimey gits trying to get round my screen.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-23 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haltedlogic.livejournal.com
Ah anyone who knows ketamine knows that it should be far far lower on ALL of those counts!!!

Ketamine always has a bad reputation, so be it, more for us :)



xxxx

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-24 10:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazymeandave.livejournal.com
too right :)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-25 11:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermonkey.livejournal.com
http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2007/03/23/assesing-the-harm-of-illegal-drugs has more detail

September 2013

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags