is it actually possible to have a truly platonic relationship with someone of the opposite sex who you find attractive, or does genetic imperative render our best intentions ultimately unrealistic?
Current Music:systematic violence - raise the sound
Presumably you mean 'sexually attractive'? I find all of my friends attractive otherwise I wouldn't be friends with them in the first place, but don't necessarily fancy all of them. I believe physical attraction forms part of the basis of all relationships [extra-familial, obv.] to some degree.
But yes, I think it's possible to have an entirely platonic relationship with someone you find physically attractive.
NOt in my experience, but then if I am attracted to someone I tend to act on it. Plus I have no problem with casual sex and many girls are terrified of being branded a slut so wont mess around with boys unless they are in a relationship with them.
None taken. I didn't realise my WordPress/LiveJournal crossposter would also post from my Twitter/WordPress crossposter. Oh the joys of multiple plug-ins relying on (and dispatching) the same non-unique application calls. I've had a quick tinker and it should be fixed (i.e. not crossposting Twitter to LJ) but if you see it again, give me a shout.
Ummm. Part of me says "of course" because I have that (both with people I have and have not slept with). Plus if I'm in a happy relationship then external naughtyness is off the cards entirely.
BUT, but but but- IF I'm single and I find someone sexually attractive would I think (not ness act upon in any way) about having sex with them? Course I would. So is that platonic?
Why would you WANT a platonic relationship if you find someone attractive? Also, I have ended friendships when I have realised the guy just wants to get i my pants as I feel its cruel to lead them on if I know it will never happen.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 09:36 am (UTC)But yes, I think it's possible to have an entirely platonic relationship with someone you find physically attractive.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 09:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 09:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:23 am (UTC)and No
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:26 am (UTC)Although it does depend on your need for ultimate gratification - if not having something you want will drive you insane eventually, it won't work.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:34 am (UTC)None taken. I didn't realise my WordPress/LiveJournal crossposter would also post from my Twitter/WordPress crossposter. Oh the joys of multiple plug-ins relying on (and dispatching) the same non-unique application calls. I've had a quick tinker and it should be fixed (i.e. not crossposting Twitter to LJ) but if you see it again, give me a shout.
Re: this post
Not sure at all. Might have more to say later ;)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:37 am (UTC)BUT, but but but- IF I'm single and I find someone sexually attractive would I think (not ness act upon in any way) about having sex with them? Course I would. So is that platonic?
JmC
I have an icon for this and everything
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 10:44 am (UTC)I'm sure he must have fancied a few women occasionally
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 12:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 03:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 04:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 04:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-25 05:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-26 12:22 pm (UTC)